Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/customer/www/myvuenews.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/daily-news/functions.php on line 309

Out of Order

At any scale of vision 20/20 20/70 or 20/200, it doesn’t take much to figure out the economic is scrawny, visibly in retreat from widespread economic insecurity, crime and legal threats (the new normal we’re not used to) that have produced results tied to the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) socialist administration’s overriding governance on the exploit of handouts.

The fundamental delusion is more political ideology-as-usual that runs amok with piecemeal political tactics. In turn, budget commitments are growing unabated, government debt loads balloon, dipping into national reserves becomes a habit and debt-to-GDP ratio continues to dampen the economic environment.

It’s January 25, 2016, and Anthony still proffers belated statistics of choice for the first half of 2015, with enthusiasm. “Our fiscal balances continue to show improvement. An overall deficit of $-27.2 million was recorded for the first half of the fiscal year 2015/16, representing a 55.8 percent reduction from the $-61.6 million in 2014/15.”

This tells the story of the SLP socialist administration operating from the rear and feeling upbeat in the showmanship of confidence, even though blindsided by events to date in world markets.

In the context of Anthony’s theory the following is his upbeat assessment on the performance of the national economy. 

“Most economic sectors showed signs of recovery within the first nine months of 2015; construction sector gained momentum, supported by continued buoyancy in tourism, agriculture and other services.

Construction activity was led by the private sector as work commenced on the construction of the Royalton Hotel, the former Smugglers Resort. The trend continued on a number of projects, including Tides Sugar Beach in Soufriere, Harbour Club Hotel, the Courts Megastore, and the Dayana Commercial Centre;

“This increased level of activity was reflected in a 13.5 percent increase in the importation of construction materials over the period from January to September 2015; 

“A 6.4 percent increase in total arrivals over the January to November period;

“An increase of 10.1 and 2.6 percent in cruise and stay over arrivals respectively over the period, which contributed to higher visitor expenditure at an estimated $414.5 million in the first half of the year;

“Higher levels of domestic and export demand were reflected in a 6.3 percent increase in manufacturing production;

“The output of food and food products increased by 21.6 percent, corrugated paper and paper board by 12.5 percent, wood and wood products by 11.6 percent and furnishings by 16.1 percent. From all vantage points, these increases are welcome and encouraging.”

And the good feeling to believe that employment is down from 25 percent to 23.5 percent, while youth unemployment is 44 percent.

Either way one examines the feel-good theories put forward, something is wrong. Great news is not around the corner and confidence to believe is an abstract speculation.

On the issue of IMPACS, the can is as usual being kicked up the road to kill time, only to return later. Meanwhile the services of a firm of lawyers based in the United States capital of Washington, DC, to represent the IMPACS matter is a further burden on taxpayers, who eventually must pay the piper.

So, in spite of Anthony’s rather lame attempt in showmanship to be upbeat, it becomes more and more difficult to govern and to deliver on grandiose commitments and awful agreements, while the economy is stifling and standards of living suffer.

“At the end of the fiscal year, the stock of official public debt stood at $2,787.0 million, representing an increase in nominal terms of 4.9 percent. The debt-to-GDP ratio now stands at 73.5 percent, slightly lower than the 73.7 percent observed in 2013.” ~ Budget Statement 2015

This means, while revenues remain strained and debt balloons, the country is growing heavily indebted, giving way to a widening fiscal deficit. And in short order, government debt payments and interest rates grow larger than infrastructure projects. 

History has shown this is not a fiscally bold agenda, given limited economic tools, but of course, there is the SLP’s appetite to tax and spend. The continuous taking away from Peter to pay Paul; assisted by plan B – citizenship by investment program (CIP) in the new heights of dysfunction to redistribute other people’s money and feel good about it. 

On CIP Prime Minister Kenny Anthony avowed:

“I am excited by the progress in the citizenship by investment programme and its prospects for the future;

“But given the persistent decline in foreign direct investment caused by the world financial crisis, the mounting challenges to raise money for our development, the increasing use of citizenship programmes by other countries as an incentive tool, we took the decision to offer a similar programme;

“Rest assured that I understand your concerns and fears. After all, I too was a non-believer in the necessity and viability of such programmes. I offer those who have anxieties the comfort that we have designed the most transparent, robust, and structured programme to ensure that issues of credibility and integrity are well protected; 

“Whilst we have spent the last four years stabilising and restoring our economic foundation, the citizenship by investment programme will provide impetus to our recovering economy to take off in the coming months.” 

Here’s what’s missing! 

Saint Lucia’s CIP, even mainstreamed to high net-worth individuals, will not deliver the milk and honey, in much the same way as socialism did not, but will pose substantial governance and integrity challenges that could exacerbate existing vulnerabilities and amplify external threats. Never mind the superficial facades, this program is a straight sale – cash for passports – rather than a route towards citizenship (residency/work permit; permanent residency; citizenship say within three to five years) in the form of an investment in the economy and real connection to the country. 

Therefore, there is plenty to be nervous about, regardless of what neophytes propagate. The reality is such programs lack fiscal discipline and it is reckless to rely, have faith in and confidence for real economic stability. And to all intents and purposes, the hidden agendas allude to the creation of an elite class of questionable safety havens, and the attempt towards political and economic conquest. Without question this will attract more intense scrutiny and isolation for Saint Lucia sufficient to pose an immediate chill in 98 degrees of sunshine. 

In previous writings I have argued for an investment strategy with real capital to encompass the removal of barriers to provide capital to SMEs: participation in private capital investment and a common economic and political regimen capable of delivering practical solutions for a sustainable growth path.

Consequently, fiscal responsibility is required to lower the debt to GDP ratio below 60 percent to demonstrate government capability to support debt, rebuild trust and boost public and private investments. Also, weak coordination cannot continue to undermine investment, causing anxiety and severe socio-economic adversity. But if the SLP administration continues to put cronies in charge of the economy and keeps changing the rules with status quo bureaucrats who just suck their thumbs, then capital that is already in short supply will go elsewhere.

This is more sensitive now, as Saint Lucia will need to transform in cohesion – in the midst of market volatility – in a can-do attitude and in real time. Investment decision-making and reforms go hand in hand and, likewise, access to capital and information wins in the light of shrewd coordination and disciplined discussion. National cohesion is crucial to provide renewed confidence but the slow pace of progressive reform to improve the economic, legal and social fundamentals and to invest in the younger generation is inadequate to reposition the country.

Facing that choice is the immediate gravity to develop a strategy with the virtue of being realistic; and an educated public to undertake new platforms to share facts, opinions, and ideas with good management; and fiscal discipline to keep the hopes and dream of a young nation celebrating 37 years on February 22, moving steadily forward.

Beyond that, much talk and bad acting that is already pie in the sky “will remain but a fleeting illusion to be pursued, but never attained.” (Bob Marley) More often than not, governments come to power, dazzle with a great vision and good intensions but bluff on their ability to execute their plans to transform the political and economic scene, grow the economy and create jobs by putting more money in the hands of the poor. Four years later, the SLP’s promises/policy has no quantitative effect on the economy except to disengage the obvious and litigate opponents while concentrating on achieving unfinished business.

And now, heading for another general election, the stakes are high to keep the gravy train flowing on ruthless ambition and costly misadventures. Candidates will be committed to defend the golden goose and pander to cartels of the past four years.

Elections have quantifiable consequences in the face of very real problems. Therefore, beyond the fantasy to believe in the exploits and more cynical enthusiasm on display, extreme election promises should be treated as unworthy and corny concerns rejected as well, with confidence, in the best interest of Saint Lucia.

Melanius Alphonse is a management and development consultant. He is an advocate for community development, social justice, economic freedom and equality; the Lucian People’s Movement (LPM) www.lpmstlucia.com critic on youth initiative, infrastructure, economic and business development. He can be reached at malphonse@rogers.com“>malphonse@rogers.com.


Out of order

His comments in an interview with Barbados TODAY follow Browne describing as “treason”, a reported plan to replace the Antigua-based LIAT with a Barbados-owned carrier.

It was at the end of last month that reports began circulating that a proposal had been put to Barbados, the major LIAT shareholder, to establish an airline. Browne’s reaction was swift, as he said such a move was not “in the spirit of good relations” and warned that he would be seeking the resignation of LIAT’s chief executive officer David Evans if he was the one who spearheaded the plan.

However, Inniss blasted Browne, whose government is one of four LIAT shareholders, saying his comments were “very strong” and could be considered “very damaging to regional integration”.

“As a Prime Minister you don’t accuse your colleagues of other countries of acting in a manner that can be considered to be treason; you come to the table and sit and discuss these issues,” he said.

“I think Prime Minister Gaston Browne would be well advised to take a deep breath, pick up the phone and call Prime Minister [Ralph] Gonsalves, Prime Minister [Freundel] Stuart and Prime Minister [Roosevelt] Skerrit and have a very sober and reasoned discussion about LIAT and the future of LIAT,” he added, referring to the leaders of shareholder governments St Vincent and the Grenadines, Barbados and Dominica.

Addressing the decision made at a meeting of shareholders in Barbados to move the bulk of the airline’s operations to Barbados – a move Browne is also resisting – Inniss said “Antigua was duly represented” at the meeting by its minister responsible for aviation Robin Yearwood and the decision was “very fair, balanced and reasonable”.

“So my advice to my friend Gaston Browne is ‘don’t make such undiplomatic and outlandish statements to your fellow Prime Ministers’,” he said.

Describing LIAT’s current structure as unsustainable and “a burden to taxpayers”, Inniss said that as a minister who had to deal with “constant complaints” from businesspeople in Barbados regarding LIAT when it came to the movement of goods and people around the region, he agreed with any plans to restructure the airline.

However, he declined to comment on the reported move to establish a Barbadian airline.

“I don’t know if it is true or not,” he said.

Inniss directed Barbados TODAY to Prime Minister Freundel Stuart and Minister of Tourism and International Transport Richard Sealy but efforts to reach either were unsuccessful.

When asked whether he would support a Barbadian airline, Inniss said: “Whatever decision my Prime Minister and colleague of International Transport take you can rest assured that they will have my support.”

But Inniss insisted that was not the matter at hand.

“The issue here is that Antiguans, like Barbadians, need to accept that LIAT as currently structured and operating cannot continue,” the minister said.

Businessmen Robert Pitcher and Ralph Bizzy Williams have both poured cold water on the idea of Barbados setting up its own airline.

 

Leave a Reply

error: Content is protected !!